Amazing news. Senator and former Vice Presidential candidate, now Presidential candidate John Edwards does actually believe in a personal Devil. But who is this Devil?
Is it Lucifer the fallen angel? No.
Is it Barbara Boxer the abortion advocate? No.
Is it Hillary Clinton of FBI files and Larry Flynt personal information infammy? No.
Is it anyone in political office who can utilize political power to intimidate people themselves? No.
Here is a hint; He refers to this person as a She-Devil?
Is it Michelle Malkin? Or Peggy Noonan? Is it Laura Ingraham? Deborah Rowe, Teri O'Brien, Star Parker? No, no, no.
The personal She-Devil is Ann Coulter. I guess he thought he was just 'Answering in Kind'. Wow, he's a tough one!
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/8/19/193525.shtml?s=icp
Monday, August 20, 2007
Thursday, July 05, 2007
UK Islamic, jihadist, radicalized, terrorists as 'doctors'
The word is out, the UK attempted mass murdering, multiple car bombers are apparently now known. They were 'doctors'. I suppose one could say they were also 'men'. The one thing we likely know but will never hear is that they are Islamic, jihadist, radicalized, soft-spoken, would-be-mass-murdering, terrorists. So the MSM tells us their spin so they have something to talk about. They were 'doctors'.
The terrorists on 911 I suppose we can say, they were 'students'. Or 'flight students', maybe even 'grad students' but not Islamic, jihadist, radicalized, mass murdering terrorists. Just 'students', or just 'doctors', 'the doctors'. And in a post Dr. Death, abortion on demand, partial birth abortion advocating legislators, human embryo death farming for unproductive non adult stem cells, we are suppose to be surprised that they were highly educated? Surprised that they were 'doctors committed to saving lives'?
In case the MSM and the front runner Presidential candidates of both Parties haven't noticed, the 'culture of death' is alive and killing. And 'the doctors' haven't taken or valued the Hippocratic Oath for decades! Oh, we were just so shocked. Duh.
The terrorists on 911 I suppose we can say, they were 'students'. Or 'flight students', maybe even 'grad students' but not Islamic, jihadist, radicalized, mass murdering terrorists. Just 'students', or just 'doctors', 'the doctors'. And in a post Dr. Death, abortion on demand, partial birth abortion advocating legislators, human embryo death farming for unproductive non adult stem cells, we are suppose to be surprised that they were highly educated? Surprised that they were 'doctors committed to saving lives'?
In case the MSM and the front runner Presidential candidates of both Parties haven't noticed, the 'culture of death' is alive and killing. And 'the doctors' haven't taken or valued the Hippocratic Oath for decades! Oh, we were just so shocked. Duh.
Saturday, June 30, 2007
Yahoo gets a story pretty close on stem cell unethics
http://au.news.yahoo.com/070529/2/13lkj.html
Australia joins the UK as State sanctioning tiny, unique human creations with animals and using human fetuses to be mothers and then killing the moms and such. They rightly say no cures forthcoming anytime soon for such 'bold' new State sanctioned 'science'.
I find myself in agreement with the Anglicans there and the Catholics. The sad part is the assessement that without such specific application of science, there is no hope for cures. That is highly questionable. Should we toss all our research for cures for cancer cause it isn't currently research requiring the creation of unique human lives for destruction/experimentation, cause it is hopeless witout this one approach?
I believe what they've passed in Australia should not only NOT be State sanctioned and supported, but should be discouraged and punishable by law. That said, I'd be genuinely curious of your thoughts both on this topic and on how yahoo reports on it in the link above.
Australia joins the UK as State sanctioning tiny, unique human creations with animals and using human fetuses to be mothers and then killing the moms and such. They rightly say no cures forthcoming anytime soon for such 'bold' new State sanctioned 'science'.
I find myself in agreement with the Anglicans there and the Catholics. The sad part is the assessement that without such specific application of science, there is no hope for cures. That is highly questionable. Should we toss all our research for cures for cancer cause it isn't currently research requiring the creation of unique human lives for destruction/experimentation, cause it is hopeless witout this one approach?
I believe what they've passed in Australia should not only NOT be State sanctioned and supported, but should be discouraged and punishable by law. That said, I'd be genuinely curious of your thoughts both on this topic and on how yahoo reports on it in the link above.
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Funny new flash movie on absurd beliefs... Enjoy.
Click here to enjoy for funny new flash movie on absurd beliefs, principled pluralism, and an intriguing / humorous conclusion. Right click to 'open in a new window' or just close the window to return here.
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Tiller the Killer in Kansas, late term abortion activism
http://www.christianworldviewnetwork.com/article.php/2162/
How Pro-Life, the culture of death, the rule of law, activist judges, politics, and the "good ole (boy) person" networks work in real time in a pretty clear case needing and deserving prosecution. Read, sign, and give your 2 cents.
How Pro-Life, the culture of death, the rule of law, activist judges, politics, and the "good ole (boy) person" networks work in real time in a pretty clear case needing and deserving prosecution. Read, sign, and give your 2 cents.
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Falwell and the MSM, Drive-by's, UK Reuters...
Briefly, HERE is how UK Reuters reports on Falwell after his death. Just a couple fairness questions; 1. Are evangelicals the only ones JF had who oppose gay marriage?, 2. Are evangelicals the only ones JF could find who opposed abortion?, 3. Was JF the only one who felt 911 could have been a factor of God's response to western cultural vices? On the third question, here are two links that blame cultural vice by non-evangelicals, DD and WV and DH. On the second, and first questions what about Catholics and Mormons, orthodox Jews, Islam, atheists like Bernard Nathenson, feminists for life? Lastly Reuters and other hateful, driveby, MSM, postmortum reporters, is it really fair to call the abortionists JF mentioned, "healthcare workers"? I am not now nor have I ever been a member of the mis-called moral majority. But I know fairness when I see it. Perhaps postmortum as with Nixon, some dignity might be afforded one the MSM loved to, and made it 'politically correct' to hate. I'm not holding my breath.
Al Qaeda is NOT in Iraq, Come on home? Crazy??
Maybe you didn't hear the Democrat Party national leadership, the liberals, and the left wingers. Al Qaeda is not IN Iraq. We need to leave Iraq. There is no war on terror or terrorists or terrorism in Iraq. We lost Iraq.
Then some group calling itself Al Qaeda says they kidnapped three of our troops in Iraq. What are we to think now? Here are some options:
1. Say it isn't Iraq where are troops were located?
2. Say it isn't Al Qaeda that said they were Al Qaeda?
3. Say Al Qaeda isn't a terrorist organization?
4. Bring our troops home today and ask Al Qaeda to fight them here?
Oops, strike #4 in part. Why? Well because radical jihadist Islamic extremists are already doing this here via their attempt on military Fort training place in the south.
Ah but then the trial lawyers can represent the extremists and Al Qaeda and make some money off the war demonizing how someone else "made them that way." The trouble is it is hard to get a hardened terrorist to 'cry on cue for the cameras' and talk about his mommy and daddy's neglect and shave and shower and look like a Menendez brother.
What? It appears the surge which hasn't even reached its full strength yet has all ready run out of time and failed in its mission. It all sounds so familiar now. Right is wrong, up is down, terrorists are good, we are terrorists.
So we approve the surge then only let it spurt about 2/3rds of the way and give it a week to complete the task, a week that is before it fully begins. That's fair.
Pray our countrymen and women, our troops, their commanders, the political grandstanders and their puppet masters on the radical Left are all seen for what and who they are. This is (of course) an "its gonna take a miracle" prayer because our major outlet media from the NY Times and all its want-to-be mimics (Gannett, LA Times, etc) as well as CNN and all its want-to-be mimics like MSNBC, Daytime TV etc are committed to ONLY showing the most embarrassing and imbicilic individualistic idiosyncratic aspects of our troops, their commanders, and their supporters. Keep praying though. God majors in the impossible.
Then some group calling itself Al Qaeda says they kidnapped three of our troops in Iraq. What are we to think now? Here are some options:
1. Say it isn't Iraq where are troops were located?
2. Say it isn't Al Qaeda that said they were Al Qaeda?
3. Say Al Qaeda isn't a terrorist organization?
4. Bring our troops home today and ask Al Qaeda to fight them here?
Oops, strike #4 in part. Why? Well because radical jihadist Islamic extremists are already doing this here via their attempt on military Fort training place in the south.
Ah but then the trial lawyers can represent the extremists and Al Qaeda and make some money off the war demonizing how someone else "made them that way." The trouble is it is hard to get a hardened terrorist to 'cry on cue for the cameras' and talk about his mommy and daddy's neglect and shave and shower and look like a Menendez brother.
What? It appears the surge which hasn't even reached its full strength yet has all ready run out of time and failed in its mission. It all sounds so familiar now. Right is wrong, up is down, terrorists are good, we are terrorists.
So we approve the surge then only let it spurt about 2/3rds of the way and give it a week to complete the task, a week that is before it fully begins. That's fair.
Pray our countrymen and women, our troops, their commanders, the political grandstanders and their puppet masters on the radical Left are all seen for what and who they are. This is (of course) an "its gonna take a miracle" prayer because our major outlet media from the NY Times and all its want-to-be mimics (Gannett, LA Times, etc) as well as CNN and all its want-to-be mimics like MSNBC, Daytime TV etc are committed to ONLY showing the most embarrassing and imbicilic individualistic idiosyncratic aspects of our troops, their commanders, and their supporters. Keep praying though. God majors in the impossible.
Monday, April 30, 2007
Wallis, the NY Times, and the faith of Obama
First, a couple how shall I say, not highlights but low-lights from the article.
1. Jim Wallis the white guilt so-called progressive so-called evangelical has pronounced Barak Obama a Christian and is helping him campaign.
2. Barak's faith is more communal and in terms of inequality read redistribution.
3. Barak's spiritual mentor saw everything in terms of black and white oppression and Barak was apparently estranged from his pastor and spiritual mentor at his mentor's death.
4. Barak's pastor mentor once told him if he won the primary he'd have to distance himself from his pastor, but my guess is this will be no problem for Barak because as recently as the late 80s Barak was being urged to be a Christian and join a church but refused. And he is eager to cheer those who want the church separated from politics and the State, unless they are of the more liberational theology sort (like Wallis and his alleged former pastor Wright).
5. Barak is a Christian but he doubts the existence of God and isn't big on miracles and wonders if there really is any afterlife and wonders if anything ever existed before the Big Bang. Christians can have doubts and thinking ones do, but they don't tend to let ones of this magnitude go without some word of witness to believing in the Creator, Redeemer, and Source of eternal life.
I'm guessing Jim Wallis and Barak Obama may need to coin a new kind of Christian for Barak, "the atheist-Christian". And perhaps they can coin a new one for Jim Wallis, 'the atheist Christian affirming evangelical'. That is real progressive! Or was that regressive?
The New York Times, Jim Wallis, and Rick Warren (apparently) on the faith of Obama.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/us/politics/30obama.html
1. Jim Wallis the white guilt so-called progressive so-called evangelical has pronounced Barak Obama a Christian and is helping him campaign.
2. Barak's faith is more communal and in terms of inequality read redistribution.
3. Barak's spiritual mentor saw everything in terms of black and white oppression and Barak was apparently estranged from his pastor and spiritual mentor at his mentor's death.
4. Barak's pastor mentor once told him if he won the primary he'd have to distance himself from his pastor, but my guess is this will be no problem for Barak because as recently as the late 80s Barak was being urged to be a Christian and join a church but refused. And he is eager to cheer those who want the church separated from politics and the State, unless they are of the more liberational theology sort (like Wallis and his alleged former pastor Wright).
5. Barak is a Christian but he doubts the existence of God and isn't big on miracles and wonders if there really is any afterlife and wonders if anything ever existed before the Big Bang. Christians can have doubts and thinking ones do, but they don't tend to let ones of this magnitude go without some word of witness to believing in the Creator, Redeemer, and Source of eternal life.
I'm guessing Jim Wallis and Barak Obama may need to coin a new kind of Christian for Barak, "the atheist-Christian". And perhaps they can coin a new one for Jim Wallis, 'the atheist Christian affirming evangelical'. That is real progressive! Or was that regressive?
The New York Times, Jim Wallis, and Rick Warren (apparently) on the faith of Obama.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/us/politics/30obama.html
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
After a 30+ year reign of deadly judicial fiats...a line.
In 1973 I was told Roe was just for the 1st trimester, then Bolton made it anytime for 'health' reasons defining health in the broadest (any reason) terms. Then Roe and Wade both became pro-life but no change in the law.
Then partial birth of sometimes viable children, then "treatment not to treat" newborns and a Presidential candidate flirting with infanticide. (Aside on viability: Weren't snowflake children, now viable children who were once frozen human embryos, adopted and brought to term, viable when they were frozen and living outside the mother's womb or does IVF only implant dead human embryos(?)...I'm confused a bit about viability. Not! They are viable and we are all confused as science brings for new understandings of viability.)
Finally a ban on partial birth abortion passes with a huge majority of both Houses supporting the ban and it gets a Presidential veto not just once from the champion of values, Bill Clinton. Ah but then George W. Bush gets it and signs it.
And activist, unaccountable justices challenge it for almost the full duration of W's administration. Finally the Supreme's hear it and apparently Scalia's low emotional EQ didn't frost the border-line Supremes and Kennedy flipped positions (frankly so should Souter!), and perhaps but not necessarily, compliments of Justice Robert's skill, reasoning, and higher emotional EQ than the otherwise brilliant Scalia.
And (drum roll please) the US Supreme Court rightly upholds the ban on partial birth abortion. One facebook group (and a pro-life one if you can believe it!) said if anyone was excited about this from either side that they were likely extremists! Well call me an extremist then. After over 30 years praying, working, lobbying, voting, informing, teaching, and praying some more, FINALLY a line has been drawn somewhere in the sand. Hopefully sand mixed with water and concrete.
Thank you George W. Bush, Congress, voters from both political parties who opposed partial birth abortion and United States Supreme Court. Thank you very much! I am excited. Yes. Thank you Jesus! Frankly I hope many will join me in being grateful. But keep on being discerning and engaged because the culture of death is not going to be happy until we are distributing abortion-causing, after-conception pills that were only politically nuanced through the FDA in the last couple years, performing tax-funded mass human embryo cloning, and allowing for hard-case, second-glance infanticide and such.
I expect to hear every hard case imaginable, real and mostly hypothetical soon. I'm sure we are going to hear from powerful personalities that promised to move to Canada if W was elected, that saving developed human children from being partially-birthed and the scissors inserted to the back of the head, brain sucking, skull breaking treatment is very bad and nearly the end of the world. But they are wrong.
The Supreme Court, majorities in both Houses, and President George W. Bush and the voters who elected him were right. I must confess that I do wonder what Hillary, Rudy, McCain, and Obama really think about this today.
I'm hoping if they are "personally opposed" (you know, like one might give favor to ones preference of a certain ice cream flavor) that they won't be wanting to push their privately held and frankly deadly views... But enough on the culture of death and their hereto unstoppable 30+ year reign of judicial fiats. This day is a really very wonderful day!
Then partial birth of sometimes viable children, then "treatment not to treat" newborns and a Presidential candidate flirting with infanticide. (Aside on viability: Weren't snowflake children, now viable children who were once frozen human embryos, adopted and brought to term, viable when they were frozen and living outside the mother's womb or does IVF only implant dead human embryos(?)...I'm confused a bit about viability. Not! They are viable and we are all confused as science brings for new understandings of viability.)
Finally a ban on partial birth abortion passes with a huge majority of both Houses supporting the ban and it gets a Presidential veto not just once from the champion of values, Bill Clinton. Ah but then George W. Bush gets it and signs it.
And activist, unaccountable justices challenge it for almost the full duration of W's administration. Finally the Supreme's hear it and apparently Scalia's low emotional EQ didn't frost the border-line Supremes and Kennedy flipped positions (frankly so should Souter!), and perhaps but not necessarily, compliments of Justice Robert's skill, reasoning, and higher emotional EQ than the otherwise brilliant Scalia.
And (drum roll please) the US Supreme Court rightly upholds the ban on partial birth abortion. One facebook group (and a pro-life one if you can believe it!) said if anyone was excited about this from either side that they were likely extremists! Well call me an extremist then. After over 30 years praying, working, lobbying, voting, informing, teaching, and praying some more, FINALLY a line has been drawn somewhere in the sand. Hopefully sand mixed with water and concrete.
Thank you George W. Bush, Congress, voters from both political parties who opposed partial birth abortion and United States Supreme Court. Thank you very much! I am excited. Yes. Thank you Jesus! Frankly I hope many will join me in being grateful. But keep on being discerning and engaged because the culture of death is not going to be happy until we are distributing abortion-causing, after-conception pills that were only politically nuanced through the FDA in the last couple years, performing tax-funded mass human embryo cloning, and allowing for hard-case, second-glance infanticide and such.
I expect to hear every hard case imaginable, real and mostly hypothetical soon. I'm sure we are going to hear from powerful personalities that promised to move to Canada if W was elected, that saving developed human children from being partially-birthed and the scissors inserted to the back of the head, brain sucking, skull breaking treatment is very bad and nearly the end of the world. But they are wrong.
The Supreme Court, majorities in both Houses, and President George W. Bush and the voters who elected him were right. I must confess that I do wonder what Hillary, Rudy, McCain, and Obama really think about this today.
I'm hoping if they are "personally opposed" (you know, like one might give favor to ones preference of a certain ice cream flavor) that they won't be wanting to push their privately held and frankly deadly views... But enough on the culture of death and their hereto unstoppable 30+ year reign of judicial fiats. This day is a really very wonderful day!
If you missed, you can still get some great stuff!
Did you miss the April 07 Graduate and Faculty Ministry retreat at the UW Madison? Too bad if you did ... But Wait...!
All the plenary sessions were digitally recorded and stream on the web or you can click & hold, or right-click them and download them to your mp3 player! Also all the handouts and powerpoints are up online as well! You may have missed the road trip, fellowship with colleagues, and the nice Spring weather and bomfire but the content is right here for you.
http://www.gfmuiuc.net/april07conference/Site/Audio.html
I would highly recommend the two sessions with Sharon Gartland and with Ric Ashley and the breakout with James Southard for men. The other breakout was good if you are interested in the new theology of Paul and Sanders and such but I recommend with some reservations as I had a significant amount of questions on this, but if you are into NT Wright and his thoughts on Sanders, you may well appreciate this session a lot, as well.
=== === === === === === === === === === ===
OK, but what awaits me? Check out this two page pdf brochure with Stanton L. Jones on "Sexual Ethics, Faith, and the University", in Toledo, OH., June 8-10, here http://mwgfm.org/images/June07GLE.pdf
That's it? No, there's more. July 12-14 in Kansas City, Missouri "Truth Under Deconstruction" with Paul Vitz, Norman Geisler, and J.P. Moreland here http://www.iics.com/
Faculty Conference. Cedar Campus. "In Thy light we see light" http://www.intervarsity.org/gfm/event_item.php?id=816 Dr. Michael J. Murray (Philosophy), Dr. Daniel J. Trier (Theology), Dr. Steven Telian (Otolaryngology). June 16-22, 2007.
All the plenary sessions were digitally recorded and stream on the web or you can click & hold, or right-click them and download them to your mp3 player! Also all the handouts and powerpoints are up online as well! You may have missed the road trip, fellowship with colleagues, and the nice Spring weather and bomfire but the content is right here for you.
http://www.gfmuiuc.net/april07conference/Site/Audio.html
I would highly recommend the two sessions with Sharon Gartland and with Ric Ashley and the breakout with James Southard for men. The other breakout was good if you are interested in the new theology of Paul and Sanders and such but I recommend with some reservations as I had a significant amount of questions on this, but if you are into NT Wright and his thoughts on Sanders, you may well appreciate this session a lot, as well.
=== === === === === === === === === === ===
OK, but what awaits me? Check out this two page pdf brochure with Stanton L. Jones on "Sexual Ethics, Faith, and the University", in Toledo, OH., June 8-10, here http://mwgfm.org/images/June07GLE.pdf
That's it? No, there's more. July 12-14 in Kansas City, Missouri "Truth Under Deconstruction" with Paul Vitz, Norman Geisler, and J.P. Moreland here http://www.iics.com/
Faculty Conference. Cedar Campus. "In Thy light we see light" http://www.intervarsity.org/gfm/event_item.php?id=816 Dr. Michael J. Murray (Philosophy), Dr. Daniel J. Trier (Theology), Dr. Steven Telian (Otolaryngology). June 16-22, 2007.
"Nexus: The Future of Healthcare, Science, and Humanity" Center for BioEthics and Human Dignity, July 12-14, 2007. http://www.cbhd.org/conferences/2007/index.htm Dr.Alvin Plantinga, Dr. David Prentice, Dr. Christina Bieber Lake, Joni Erickson Tada, Dr., Dr. Brent Waters, O.C. Snead J.D., Nigel Cameron.
OK, that's it. Have a great day and enjoy the fabulous resources from scholars with a living faith that influences their thinking, teaching, research, publishing, and public witness!
Monday, April 02, 2007
Zbigniew, Duke, Jimmy Carter, Yahoo's
Jimmy Carter's former head of national security Zbigniew Brzezinski spoke last week at Duke and a bigger scandal should have happened than the one Duke was exposed to most recently. The local paper reported on the speech here:
http://www.heraldsun.com/durham/4-834412.cfm
Brzezinski said we need not assume that if we bailed out of Iraq today that there would have to be any blood-letting and stated that clearly such didn't happen when we pulled out of Vietnam. Ahem, It is good to remember why we don't want these elitists back in the White House.
No blood letting after we pulled out of Vietnam and no chaos in connecting countries? Such is the sort of 'left-nic cleansing' of the appeaser' s memory. Z-big-new, are you a brain dead ninny? Have you never heard of the Killing fields of Cambodia? Were you watching the 'Love Boat' when the news media briefly showed us the boat people fleeing murder, mayhem, and torture, favoring starvation or being eaten by sharks to their treatment under the surge of communist "liberators". Liberators of yours, Carter's, and Jane Fonda's ilk. Joined lately by Kerry, Murtha, Sheehan, and Pelossi.
Z-big-new, according to your and Jimmy Carter's worldview what exactly were these slaughtered lives then? Clearly if they were not humans experiencing bloodletting in your view, what were they! Were they just extra human embryos that were going to die anyway!? Were they sub-human and only "potential persons"!? Are you telling us not to worry, it all helped advance the glorious 'science' of population control and diminished the global warming at least from these human animals? Is this what you are telling us? Is this the Carter, Brzezinski, Murtha, Sheehan thinking and historical viewpoint? What loons! What a bunch of yahoos!
Zbigniew and Jimmy should have had an opportunity to sit where Daniel Pearl sat with the hooded men behind them and spin their near-absolute stupidity. The terrorists would have likely had a gut splitting laugh at their captive diplomat's near-lunatic loggings. Alas, only in the western media would such be quoted only with a sidebar question only. No snearing. No incredulous laughing out loud. No shaming the speaker or insider-mockery. No, when people of this ilk say such things we must seek first to understand. 'What could this mean?' or 'What must he have really meant?' or some polite benefit of the doubt, benefit of restrained incredulity. Why is this? He said it. He said it publicly. He has speech writers and screeners. He said it at a major university. He is a loon.
These two (Carter and Brzezinski, sounds like Lewinski...sort of) are silly and if we want to be gracious about it, let us just call it early senility. But please media and major universities, please don't embarrass them publicly by quoting them or interviewing them. Let them ride off into the Reagan sunset. They clearly will need help doing so as graciously as Reagan did. This is sad. Very sad if it weren't so pathetic. And very pathetic if it weren't feeding gun powder to the pitbull "peace at anyone elses' price" culture of death activists. OK, evil then.
Yahoo news today continues the nonsense with the headline that Iran sees hope in England's response to their (Iranian) illegal activities capturing and likely torturing the UK's Navy personnel and utilizing the captured in media propoganda footage. It is just so wonderful that Yahoo, like Duke, can report on such matters and make sure to give Iran the moral high ground along with Brzezinski and Carter, Michael Moore and Cindy Sheehan, military superstars Murtha and Kerry, and Pelossi and Kennedy and... Oops, I hurled my cookies.
http://www.heraldsun.com/durham/4-834412.cfm
Brzezinski said we need not assume that if we bailed out of Iraq today that there would have to be any blood-letting and stated that clearly such didn't happen when we pulled out of Vietnam. Ahem, It is good to remember why we don't want these elitists back in the White House.
No blood letting after we pulled out of Vietnam and no chaos in connecting countries? Such is the sort of 'left-nic cleansing' of the appeaser' s memory. Z-big-new, are you a brain dead ninny? Have you never heard of the Killing fields of Cambodia? Were you watching the 'Love Boat' when the news media briefly showed us the boat people fleeing murder, mayhem, and torture, favoring starvation or being eaten by sharks to their treatment under the surge of communist "liberators". Liberators of yours, Carter's, and Jane Fonda's ilk. Joined lately by Kerry, Murtha, Sheehan, and Pelossi.
Z-big-new, according to your and Jimmy Carter's worldview what exactly were these slaughtered lives then? Clearly if they were not humans experiencing bloodletting in your view, what were they! Were they just extra human embryos that were going to die anyway!? Were they sub-human and only "potential persons"!? Are you telling us not to worry, it all helped advance the glorious 'science' of population control and diminished the global warming at least from these human animals? Is this what you are telling us? Is this the Carter, Brzezinski, Murtha, Sheehan thinking and historical viewpoint? What loons! What a bunch of yahoos!
Zbigniew and Jimmy should have had an opportunity to sit where Daniel Pearl sat with the hooded men behind them and spin their near-absolute stupidity. The terrorists would have likely had a gut splitting laugh at their captive diplomat's near-lunatic loggings. Alas, only in the western media would such be quoted only with a sidebar question only. No snearing. No incredulous laughing out loud. No shaming the speaker or insider-mockery. No, when people of this ilk say such things we must seek first to understand. 'What could this mean?' or 'What must he have really meant?' or some polite benefit of the doubt, benefit of restrained incredulity. Why is this? He said it. He said it publicly. He has speech writers and screeners. He said it at a major university. He is a loon.
These two (Carter and Brzezinski, sounds like Lewinski...sort of) are silly and if we want to be gracious about it, let us just call it early senility. But please media and major universities, please don't embarrass them publicly by quoting them or interviewing them. Let them ride off into the Reagan sunset. They clearly will need help doing so as graciously as Reagan did. This is sad. Very sad if it weren't so pathetic. And very pathetic if it weren't feeding gun powder to the pitbull "peace at anyone elses' price" culture of death activists. OK, evil then.
Yahoo news today continues the nonsense with the headline that Iran sees hope in England's response to their (Iranian) illegal activities capturing and likely torturing the UK's Navy personnel and utilizing the captured in media propoganda footage. It is just so wonderful that Yahoo, like Duke, can report on such matters and make sure to give Iran the moral high ground along with Brzezinski and Carter, Michael Moore and Cindy Sheehan, military superstars Murtha and Kerry, and Pelossi and Kennedy and... Oops, I hurled my cookies.
Saturday, March 17, 2007
Facebook is cool
I'm now on facebook. Go to http://facebook.com and give them a login and a password and you can keep up with friends in the university world and beyond with pics and email and names AND faces quickly and easily. There are also some cool groups like a CS Lewis fan club and various graduate student and professional student organizational groups. Get connected! Joe Whitchurch
Friday, February 09, 2007
Constitution, Living flexible document, Original intent
The last couple weeks of '24' there has been a lot of discussion on the Constitution of the USA and how the assertive interrogation of terrorists violates such and how the listening in on citizens who call terrorist supporting organizations, violates the Constitution. This intrigues me since terrorists overseas being called are not citizens of the USA and our Constitution does not address their protections per se. The same with questioning enemy combatants who are not apparently acting on behalf of any country who are significantly implicated (shooting at civilians or Iraqi security forces or planting roadside bombs and such) in having some terror network information.
The thought I had as one who leans more in the direction of words having meaning and the authors' intent being important, is that it strikes me that the ones who are crying the loudest about the Constitution's literal application to non citizen terrorists groups being phoned or when a terrorist without a country is caught on a battlefield or in plotting the destruction of aircraft or citizen traveled domestic bridges for instance, and such a one is interrogated, these are the very ones who are more 'flexible' read wishy washy about the Constitutional intent generally. It means nothing for citizens, it means everything for terrorists and their USA citizen friends. This is a Marxist replacement of the alleged oppressed class which can do no wrong.
These 'flexible document types' on the Constitution have all kinds of definitional work-arounds in contexts related to the framers' worldview and understanding of what constitutes a marriage and common law, or framer understanding of the right to life of developing children, and the framers' understanding and intent related to the the establishment clause. Obviously this clause is not to prevent religions and churches and other faiths from lobbying and affecting public discourse and otherwise influencing government but rather to keep government from working to establishing a particular religion or sect as the official State sect or religion or faith.
Sadly these Constitutional 'living flexible document' types bemoaning the treatment of non citizen terrorists without a country are clearly lobbying for the Constitution's establishment clause being applied to teach that our government (that recognized rights coming from God and not the king or other heirarchies) should be establishing (choose your favorite expression) secularism, secular humanism, or atheism. I would say it is trying to establish agnosticism but to do so one must say they "do not know about God" and doing this mentions "God" and like the teaching of even intelligent design apparently even the mention of deity or some intelligence that is transcendent to human intelligence is anathama, disallowed, out of order... to the new living and flexible constitutionalists who care so strongly about the constitutional rights of terrorists.
OK, I think the last two episodes of '24' (other than the viability of suitcase nukes finally getting network mention) are very stupid in the continued banter of Jack and his brother and his father all taking turns deceiving and holding each other at gun point and torturing each other. Talk about dysfuctional families! But the conversation about the Constitution is important and sadly no characters in '24' are getting it anywhere near correctly.
The thought I had as one who leans more in the direction of words having meaning and the authors' intent being important, is that it strikes me that the ones who are crying the loudest about the Constitution's literal application to non citizen terrorists groups being phoned or when a terrorist without a country is caught on a battlefield or in plotting the destruction of aircraft or citizen traveled domestic bridges for instance, and such a one is interrogated, these are the very ones who are more 'flexible' read wishy washy about the Constitutional intent generally. It means nothing for citizens, it means everything for terrorists and their USA citizen friends. This is a Marxist replacement of the alleged oppressed class which can do no wrong.
These 'flexible document types' on the Constitution have all kinds of definitional work-arounds in contexts related to the framers' worldview and understanding of what constitutes a marriage and common law, or framer understanding of the right to life of developing children, and the framers' understanding and intent related to the the establishment clause. Obviously this clause is not to prevent religions and churches and other faiths from lobbying and affecting public discourse and otherwise influencing government but rather to keep government from working to establishing a particular religion or sect as the official State sect or religion or faith.
Sadly these Constitutional 'living flexible document' types bemoaning the treatment of non citizen terrorists without a country are clearly lobbying for the Constitution's establishment clause being applied to teach that our government (that recognized rights coming from God and not the king or other heirarchies) should be establishing (choose your favorite expression) secularism, secular humanism, or atheism. I would say it is trying to establish agnosticism but to do so one must say they "do not know about God" and doing this mentions "God" and like the teaching of even intelligent design apparently even the mention of deity or some intelligence that is transcendent to human intelligence is anathama, disallowed, out of order... to the new living and flexible constitutionalists who care so strongly about the constitutional rights of terrorists.
OK, I think the last two episodes of '24' (other than the viability of suitcase nukes finally getting network mention) are very stupid in the continued banter of Jack and his brother and his father all taking turns deceiving and holding each other at gun point and torturing each other. Talk about dysfuctional families! But the conversation about the Constitution is important and sadly no characters in '24' are getting it anywhere near correctly.
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
Sleepy musings on recent media bias on Iraq force
Enjoy a little 3 minute musing by yours truly on some not so common sense about Iraq, principled and strategic use of force and cartoon image journalism and photo opps in Indiana and nationally by clicking here. I'll admit to being a tad peeved but rightly so. Join me by clicking here and giving a fun little listen. IF you can't take a teasing (and liberals and leftists commonly seem to be able to 'dish it out' but have very thin skin when it comes back to them) I'll forewarn you to NOT listen. I simply cannot pat your cyber-hand and say "There, there now Honey, it will be alright." (-:
Saturday, January 13, 2007
The vote on use of baby humans for spare parts...
January 11, 2007. As predicted, the U.S. House approved a bill today that would encourage taxpayer funding of human embryo experimentation, but came nowhere near the two-thirds majority needed to override President Bush's promised veto. Click here to see where your Congressman is on the vote of 253-174 (the pro-life vote is "no"). Gore and Kerry would not be so affirming as President Bush's firm commitment to prevent the taxpayer funding of experiments that use human lives as spare parts. On this one we have to tip our hats to the President and hope he continues to wisely use his veto pen to protect innocent, young, human lives from being intentionally destoyed and such destruction funded by tax dollars. It is shameful that the 'yes' vote was as high as it was. Shameful.
Thursday, December 21, 2006
Criminalize Human Embryonic Stem Cell Destruction
Criminalize Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. We have criminalized having the wrong sized car seats for infants and repeated offense can qualify one as a felon. We criminalize allowing adults to smoke in our restaurants and repeat offenses can qualify one as a repeat offender and felon. This is of course the Nanny-State at its micro-managing worst. But remember that abortion slogan, "Half of the people who go into abortion clinics for abortion services Never come out Alive!"? Well consider this. All the baby human embryos used with venture capital at universities and such around the country are KILLED when they could be adopted and become like the snowflake children.
Here is a video clip where Bush vetos funding such human destruction surrounded by young children who were formerly frozen human embryos who would have qualified for such science gone mad. Check it out here. Then ask yourself if John McCain, Rudy G., or any of the Democrat front-runners like Barack or Hillary for 2008 Presidential bid could or ever would do such. We know the answer is clearly NO. They would not only allow such human life destruction but would fund this losing and loser venture with our tax dollars if they could!
We need to criminalize this practice even when done in private research. It is another cultural cancer. Intriguingly for those with 'eyes to see', God in his providence has apparently graciously not allowed such stem cells (as opposed to those from adult sources where no unique human life is destoyed and have been productive in scores of treatments) to result in a single cure or treatment.
Here is a video clip where Bush vetos funding such human destruction surrounded by young children who were formerly frozen human embryos who would have qualified for such science gone mad. Check it out here. Then ask yourself if John McCain, Rudy G., or any of the Democrat front-runners like Barack or Hillary for 2008 Presidential bid could or ever would do such. We know the answer is clearly NO. They would not only allow such human life destruction but would fund this losing and loser venture with our tax dollars if they could!
We need to criminalize this practice even when done in private research. It is another cultural cancer. Intriguingly for those with 'eyes to see', God in his providence has apparently graciously not allowed such stem cells (as opposed to those from adult sources where no unique human life is destoyed and have been productive in scores of treatments) to result in a single cure or treatment.
Alan Keyes was Right, Just like Dan Quayle
Alan Keyes was right! Remember the 'Dan Quayle was Right' article about his comments on the cultural corruption example of Murphy Brown? Well it turns out that Alan Keyes was also right, and not so appreciated at the time of his commentary. He was right about homosexuality, gay marriage, and the activism and modeling of the Cheney link in the Bush administration. How does this advisor's role not undermine his social conservatism and stance on gay marriage? It does. Its fine for him to keep Lynn and Dick Cheney but Mary needs to be totally out of the administration loop officially and unofficially. I'm not saying rudeness or mean-spirited-ness but being frank. She's the one continually pushing the envelope with her live-in gay lover and now with her having an IV baby as a gay couple. Come on! In an age when thousands of one man and one woman, relatively intact married couples wanting children, waiting to adopt, going overseas for such and spending tons of money, how is this high profile experimentation culturally helpful. Mary's removal from access doesn't need to be super high profile, but it needs to happen and be known as having happened. Such is overdue. She will just continue to push the envelope in the wrong directions and it is an example, frankly worse than Murphy Brown.
Thursday, December 07, 2006
Baker Panel, Not repudiation, red white blue panel...
I have a red, white, and blue ribbon report that hasn't been released until now. Here are its conclusions on the Baker report.
---
1. The Baker group does NOT Totally repudiate Bush. But they do repudiate Kerry and Murtha in that its plan leaves us in Iraq through 2007 and increases our personnel there by tens of thousands, though it apparently seeks to foolishly disarm most of them.
2. The Baker plan will talk to everyone and be nice to all including terrorist and terror supporting organizations and will get them to do 'talking' and 'lying' by hurting Israel (called "the canary in the coal mine") by further forcefully pulling feathers out of the canary and perhaps sticking Israel with some voodoo needles to boot. Anyone who says negotiate with Iran is wrong-headed unless they are doing a fake, right before a sneak or surprise attack on Iran. The same can be said with Syria.
3. The Baker plan is planning for defeat like in SE Asia but without the instant visible 'boat people' TV viewing response. Baker is likely negotiating with Iran about limiting such coverage until we are totally out in two years. And thus inviting Iran to let us out so they can extend their influence in the region toward their intended first target the canary in the coal mine, Israel.
My red, white, and blue Panel of One, major report finding (smile) follows in nine short points.
1. Orchestrate through whatever channels are necessary, secretively with Israel or unilaterally a bombing campaign on known jihadist Iranian radical political, and jihadist political so-called religious leader(s) hangouts where they are most isolated and upon locations known for housing nuclear weapon research and development in after-hours to diminish unintended casualties. Even if we cannot be sure of being fully successful Iranian radical terror exporters and sword (nuke) rattlers need to be put on the defensive. They are currently engaged in terror and threatening global conquest similar to what Hitler was doing prior to WW2 but without the NY Times approval and nuclear weapons. They need something to gripe about and distract them.
2. We should tell Syria if they'd like to avoid such occuring in Damascus they can join us in Iraq expelling Iranian forces and giving us intelligence reports on happenings inside Iran. We can support the students who want freedom in Iran and worthy Syrians can help us weed out Iranians in Iraq aware that any slip up and Damascus jihadist-supporting politicals will suffer the same selective bombing fate. They can tell us what they did with the WMDs smuggled out of Iraq chemical and otherwise and be given a TIMETABLE for doing so in a verifiable way. And they should just start doing some democratic republic, power-sharing reforms now because contrary to what Rick Warren said, we know full well that they aren't that great on freedom of thinking, freedom of religious affiliation choices, and political pluralism. They also stink on human rights and we pretty much know they have also undermined our efforts to find the WMDs and to put down the radical jihadist terrorists in Iraq. They should even be called upon for a TIMETABLE of when such political reforms and intelligence information will be forthcoming before Damascus politicals encounters some fly-over wake-up calls. Oh yes, and they'll have to give Hezzbollah up too. We aren't asking for much. This is how you negotiate. Not by starting off with the kid gloves and inviting everyone to dinner as equally principled peace parnters.
3. Our military or better, our military forces supporting Iraqi military forces should forcefully remove Sodr and his top 5 generals from influence politically even if doing so involves killing them. Last I heard, they are at war with us and this is what happens in war. They are destabilizing and terrorizing and killing scores to undermine Iraq opportunities to exist as a unified nation under a rule of non jihadist law in a more democratic republic. There are people under Sodr's manipulative forces that would likely want a principled power-sharing government of genuine Islamic moderates but whose voices and personalities are unknown because of his tyranny and leadership style. Saddaam's capital punishment should be done immediately and confirmed by camera coverage.
4. Increase our military presence and training and protecting of Iraqi's who will endorse a MORE principled pluralistic government including Kurds, Christians, minority Jews, and the major Islamic parties who are willing with the blood of their lives proven to defend a more democratic republic. Give them one year to make these political changes in whatever configuration they'd like to but include any Judeo-Christian participation that lives there as well in the governing bodies as minority representatives. If they cannot do this, or are slow to do this, then we should inform them in no uncertain terms that they are signaling the Iranians that their attempts at a unified government without jihadist tyranny is a joke and is merely a welfare State short term benefiting from the blood of western soldiers for mere economic recovery. Nicety nice talk isn't going to win an Islamic negotiation debate. It may sound like crap to the NY Times and American sensibilities but it is the hard truth and it is time our media started telling the truth about such needs and interactions.
5. Mutha, Gates, Kerry, Kennedy, and Dean if they make a big stink about this should be asked for a TIMETABLE as to when they will be done with their temper tantrum, or else the Justice Department should begin investigations and bring them up on charges of treason under suspicion of inciting civil war in the USA, leaking our Iraq troop security issues to the NY Times and encouraging the enemy. They do this by extending opportunities to talk with the enemy but continue dissing, demonizing, and refusing to work at all with the elected President of the United States. My guess is there are other things needing investigation with these including campaign contributions, past taking bribes, slander, etc.
6. If the President is to be impeached out of childish revenge over Bill Clinton's which he did not participate and with whom his wimpy father has been overly-friendly, whether he (W) does anything or cooperates or works bi-partisan or not... and remember that Bill Clinton was impeached but could have likely been further impeached over the multiple legal, moral, ethical, and international including Chinese military hardware and technology empowerment and N.Korean nuke empowerment stupidities and illegalities... but the point is that IF President George W. Bush is to be impeached by these partisan ideological, leftist, haters of the USA in such a childish vengeful manner anyway, he might as well be impeached for the right reasons and causes and commence with #1-5 and do so sooner rather than later.
7. It is the conviction of this red, white, and blue panel of one that the Justice Department begin investigating the NY Times now for its role in leaking sensitive military information that has harmed our troops and done so as USA citizens operating their business on USA soil, paying USA taxes, and yet acting as if they are above the country and the rule of law at the cost of the lives of our troops and the liberation success of our mission and to the empowerment of radical, terrorist, Islamic, jihadists. If the NY Times is prosecuted fairly and thoroughly for their crimes, their want-to-be look-alikes like the LA Times, CNN, and the Washington Post might see the fairness, legal enforcement, 'writing on the wall' and start acting with more prudence. And if they don't like being under the rule of law and want to rant about it, talk radio is open to them as well. But they will have to find listeners willing to listen and advertise with them for their elitist, minority radical leftist views.
8. Our military personnel and NGOs and others should have restrictions on their free political speech as returning citizens in the USA, and those in Iraq should have religious speech codes and avoidance and correctness bans lifted and be given training in how to make their religious convictions understood in honest conversations with Iraqi military and civil defense colleagues. No coercions, no manipulations, not campaigning for faith in Iraq, but not exaggerated sensitivity to hush hush Christianity either.
9. Lastly Al Jazeera should be given the same warning as Syria and be put on a TIMETABLE for ending the broadcast of Jewish hate-speech about Jews being cannibals and they should provide intelligence for those who have been promoting the use of children for suicide missions and turn them in to Iraq and coalition of the willing enforcers. If the do not, their facilities should be taken out. It is true they can broadcast again elsewhere BUT it will cost them money, lives, inconvenience and put them on the defensive for supporting such genuine State sponsored bigotry and pro genocidal attitudes and abuse of children and murder. ---
Your input on the red, white, and blue report is valued in the comments.
---
1. The Baker group does NOT Totally repudiate Bush. But they do repudiate Kerry and Murtha in that its plan leaves us in Iraq through 2007 and increases our personnel there by tens of thousands, though it apparently seeks to foolishly disarm most of them.
2. The Baker plan will talk to everyone and be nice to all including terrorist and terror supporting organizations and will get them to do 'talking' and 'lying' by hurting Israel (called "the canary in the coal mine") by further forcefully pulling feathers out of the canary and perhaps sticking Israel with some voodoo needles to boot. Anyone who says negotiate with Iran is wrong-headed unless they are doing a fake, right before a sneak or surprise attack on Iran. The same can be said with Syria.
3. The Baker plan is planning for defeat like in SE Asia but without the instant visible 'boat people' TV viewing response. Baker is likely negotiating with Iran about limiting such coverage until we are totally out in two years. And thus inviting Iran to let us out so they can extend their influence in the region toward their intended first target the canary in the coal mine, Israel.
My red, white, and blue Panel of One, major report finding (smile) follows in nine short points.
1. Orchestrate through whatever channels are necessary, secretively with Israel or unilaterally a bombing campaign on known jihadist Iranian radical political, and jihadist political so-called religious leader(s) hangouts where they are most isolated and upon locations known for housing nuclear weapon research and development in after-hours to diminish unintended casualties. Even if we cannot be sure of being fully successful Iranian radical terror exporters and sword (nuke) rattlers need to be put on the defensive. They are currently engaged in terror and threatening global conquest similar to what Hitler was doing prior to WW2 but without the NY Times approval and nuclear weapons. They need something to gripe about and distract them.
2. We should tell Syria if they'd like to avoid such occuring in Damascus they can join us in Iraq expelling Iranian forces and giving us intelligence reports on happenings inside Iran. We can support the students who want freedom in Iran and worthy Syrians can help us weed out Iranians in Iraq aware that any slip up and Damascus jihadist-supporting politicals will suffer the same selective bombing fate. They can tell us what they did with the WMDs smuggled out of Iraq chemical and otherwise and be given a TIMETABLE for doing so in a verifiable way. And they should just start doing some democratic republic, power-sharing reforms now because contrary to what Rick Warren said, we know full well that they aren't that great on freedom of thinking, freedom of religious affiliation choices, and political pluralism. They also stink on human rights and we pretty much know they have also undermined our efforts to find the WMDs and to put down the radical jihadist terrorists in Iraq. They should even be called upon for a TIMETABLE of when such political reforms and intelligence information will be forthcoming before Damascus politicals encounters some fly-over wake-up calls. Oh yes, and they'll have to give Hezzbollah up too. We aren't asking for much. This is how you negotiate. Not by starting off with the kid gloves and inviting everyone to dinner as equally principled peace parnters.
3. Our military or better, our military forces supporting Iraqi military forces should forcefully remove Sodr and his top 5 generals from influence politically even if doing so involves killing them. Last I heard, they are at war with us and this is what happens in war. They are destabilizing and terrorizing and killing scores to undermine Iraq opportunities to exist as a unified nation under a rule of non jihadist law in a more democratic republic. There are people under Sodr's manipulative forces that would likely want a principled power-sharing government of genuine Islamic moderates but whose voices and personalities are unknown because of his tyranny and leadership style. Saddaam's capital punishment should be done immediately and confirmed by camera coverage.
4. Increase our military presence and training and protecting of Iraqi's who will endorse a MORE principled pluralistic government including Kurds, Christians, minority Jews, and the major Islamic parties who are willing with the blood of their lives proven to defend a more democratic republic. Give them one year to make these political changes in whatever configuration they'd like to but include any Judeo-Christian participation that lives there as well in the governing bodies as minority representatives. If they cannot do this, or are slow to do this, then we should inform them in no uncertain terms that they are signaling the Iranians that their attempts at a unified government without jihadist tyranny is a joke and is merely a welfare State short term benefiting from the blood of western soldiers for mere economic recovery. Nicety nice talk isn't going to win an Islamic negotiation debate. It may sound like crap to the NY Times and American sensibilities but it is the hard truth and it is time our media started telling the truth about such needs and interactions.
5. Mutha, Gates, Kerry, Kennedy, and Dean if they make a big stink about this should be asked for a TIMETABLE as to when they will be done with their temper tantrum, or else the Justice Department should begin investigations and bring them up on charges of treason under suspicion of inciting civil war in the USA, leaking our Iraq troop security issues to the NY Times and encouraging the enemy. They do this by extending opportunities to talk with the enemy but continue dissing, demonizing, and refusing to work at all with the elected President of the United States. My guess is there are other things needing investigation with these including campaign contributions, past taking bribes, slander, etc.
6. If the President is to be impeached out of childish revenge over Bill Clinton's which he did not participate and with whom his wimpy father has been overly-friendly, whether he (W) does anything or cooperates or works bi-partisan or not... and remember that Bill Clinton was impeached but could have likely been further impeached over the multiple legal, moral, ethical, and international including Chinese military hardware and technology empowerment and N.Korean nuke empowerment stupidities and illegalities... but the point is that IF President George W. Bush is to be impeached by these partisan ideological, leftist, haters of the USA in such a childish vengeful manner anyway, he might as well be impeached for the right reasons and causes and commence with #1-5 and do so sooner rather than later.
7. It is the conviction of this red, white, and blue panel of one that the Justice Department begin investigating the NY Times now for its role in leaking sensitive military information that has harmed our troops and done so as USA citizens operating their business on USA soil, paying USA taxes, and yet acting as if they are above the country and the rule of law at the cost of the lives of our troops and the liberation success of our mission and to the empowerment of radical, terrorist, Islamic, jihadists. If the NY Times is prosecuted fairly and thoroughly for their crimes, their want-to-be look-alikes like the LA Times, CNN, and the Washington Post might see the fairness, legal enforcement, 'writing on the wall' and start acting with more prudence. And if they don't like being under the rule of law and want to rant about it, talk radio is open to them as well. But they will have to find listeners willing to listen and advertise with them for their elitist, minority radical leftist views.
8. Our military personnel and NGOs and others should have restrictions on their free political speech as returning citizens in the USA, and those in Iraq should have religious speech codes and avoidance and correctness bans lifted and be given training in how to make their religious convictions understood in honest conversations with Iraqi military and civil defense colleagues. No coercions, no manipulations, not campaigning for faith in Iraq, but not exaggerated sensitivity to hush hush Christianity either.
9. Lastly Al Jazeera should be given the same warning as Syria and be put on a TIMETABLE for ending the broadcast of Jewish hate-speech about Jews being cannibals and they should provide intelligence for those who have been promoting the use of children for suicide missions and turn them in to Iraq and coalition of the willing enforcers. If the do not, their facilities should be taken out. It is true they can broadcast again elsewhere BUT it will cost them money, lives, inconvenience and put them on the defensive for supporting such genuine State sponsored bigotry and pro genocidal attitudes and abuse of children and murder. ---
Your input on the red, white, and blue report is valued in the comments.
Saturday, November 04, 2006
Iraq not OK..Afghanistan OK..Haiti OK,..Iran not OK...
OK this post is for Devin and others for whom a discussion of embryonic stem cells apparently cannot help but mention the diabolical Bush on Iraq. Post away... But you might want to watch this first, CLICK HERE. I love Traffic's "Low Spark" background music.
Thursday, October 26, 2006
How many ways can cloning and stem cells be...
How many ways can the issue of human cloning for destruction and farming be misrepresented. Michael Fox sure fouled it up in his ad campaign, but fortunately St. Louis Cardinals pitcher Jeff Suppan and stars Jim Caviezel and Patricia Heaton speak out against Missouri's Cloning ammendment coming up for vote in November. Watch their, non-emotional manipulation, informative ad by clicking here.
And then there is Dr. David Prentice who is maliciously and eroneously referred to in the title bar of this youtube video, but this man is the real deal. He is a scientist doing stem cell research of the ethical sort. E.g. on adult sources of stem cells, that do not necessitate the destruction of young, unique, human embryos which have been adopted and brought to full term. And Dr. Prentice is getting results, unlike the baby killing stem cell farmers who cannot get venture capital and promise hypothetical results decades into the future. It is rare to hear people differentiate between stem cell research A. Adult, and no unique humans are destroyed, and stem cell research B. B-rated, baby human embryos destroyed to get stem cells for research that isn't even promising research! Listen and watch Dr. Prentice, an ethical stem cell researcher who has come up with cures by clicking here.
And then there is Dr. David Prentice who is maliciously and eroneously referred to in the title bar of this youtube video, but this man is the real deal. He is a scientist doing stem cell research of the ethical sort. E.g. on adult sources of stem cells, that do not necessitate the destruction of young, unique, human embryos which have been adopted and brought to full term. And Dr. Prentice is getting results, unlike the baby killing stem cell farmers who cannot get venture capital and promise hypothetical results decades into the future. It is rare to hear people differentiate between stem cell research A. Adult, and no unique humans are destroyed, and stem cell research B. B-rated, baby human embryos destroyed to get stem cells for research that isn't even promising research! Listen and watch Dr. Prentice, an ethical stem cell researcher who has come up with cures by clicking here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
